Why

Measurement apps
weren't built for inspections.

They were built for calculating measurements — not for property inspections.
Don't be fooled. We're not.

The category error

We've been asking measurement apps to run inspections.

For fifteen years the industry has done this. A firm onboards a measurement app because the carrier asked for accurate roof dimensions. Then — by slow accretion, not by design — that app becomes the inspection tool.

Photos get stored in it. Notes get typed into it. Interviews get summarized in the corner of a screen that was built to draw a slope. And because the measurement app was never designed to run an inspection, the gaps show up where everyone expects them not to.

No workflow. No completeness check. No interview provenance. No firm-level quality signal. The adjuster fills every gap with effort. The firm absorbs the rework. The carrier eats the cycle time. Nobody wins — and nobody calls it a category problem, because everyone inside the category has been doing it this way since the pitch decks said "iPad-native."

INSPEKTiT is the first inspection product built for inspections.

The adjuster cost

Measurement apps move the inspection to the desk.

Measurement apps weren't built for inspections. They were built to measure. After years of adjusters using them in the field, the real cost is obvious: the inspection moves to the desk.

After the field, you resynthesize the file — reorganizing photos, pulling notes from a separate notepad or iPad, and writing a GLR around a photo set that was never structured for the narrative it has to support. The measurement app doesn't care. That was never its job.

INSPEKTiT was built for adjusters, in the field. Photos, notes, interview, workflow, and GLR are one system — captured at the inspection, structured in real time, carrier-ready before the adjuster leaves the property. Desk time doesn't shrink around the edges. Adjusters see 40%+ less of it per claim — verified in the field, not projected.

The bar

What carrier-grade actually means.

Before anyone uses the phrase, they should have to answer for it. Here's what we're held to — and what we think every inspection platform should be held to.

Thoroughness
Every carrier-required photo, interview answer, occupancy fact, and party captured — before the adjuster leaves the property. All that's left is the estimate.
Quality
Every interview. Every party involved. Every document. Every photo. Completed on site and verified before the adjuster can get to their car.
Cycle time
Adjuster-verified benchmark of 40% decrease in desk time — allowing for faster turnaround times and reducing the potential for the claim to get kicked back.
Provenance
Every entry timestamped, geolocated, and attributable. The audit trail is part of the product, not a PDF someone assembles at the end.
Attribution
Verified by the people who produced it — the firm, the adjuster, and the inspection process itself. Signed, sealed, carrier-ready.
How we think about AI

AI engineered iT. Deterministic intelligence runs iT. Adjusters use iT.

Three layers, one principle: AI helps where it helps — nowhere else. Every other decision on the claim is deterministic, traceable, and testable.

01

Design-time AI

AI engineered the inspection workflow and logic by distilling thousands of real claims and years of adjuster field experience into a deterministic rule set. One-time job. No live model. No drift.

02

Runtime AI (narrow)

One place AI touches a live file: GLR narrative assembly from the adjuster's structured inputs. No classifications. No decisions. No inventions. Zero-hallucination risk by construction.

03

Deterministic ITTT

Photo categorization, completeness verification, carrier configuration, workflow gates — all if-this-then-that. Same inputs, same outputs, every time. Defensible under audit.

Technical brief
AI Posture — the three-layer defense for carrier review.
One page. Forward to InfoSec.
Download the one-pager →
Built by the people who run the claims

By adjusters still climbing roofs.

25+ years of adjusting baked into the platform. We built this because nobody else was going to — and because a platform built in a boardroom is a platform that wastes your time in the field.

About the team See what we built
Next steps

Built for carriers. Made for firms.

By the adjusters who still inspect the properties.

Patent pending inspection process

Read the bar. Hold us to it.